[Show all top banners]

Slackdemic
Replies to this thread:

More by Slackdemic
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Wireless Power
[VIEWED 5858 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 11-14-06 9:46 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I found this BBC's article really interesting. If several gadgets can go wireless, why not power to them also wireless? Afterall, wireless is also some kind of "power" that is wirelessly given! :)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6129460.stm

Physics promises wireless power
Jonathan Fildes
Science and technology reporter, BBC News



The tangle of cables and plugs needed to recharge today's electronic gadgets could soon be a thing of the past.

US researchers have outlined a relatively simple system that could deliver power to devices such as laptop computers or MP3 players wirelessly.

The concept exploits century-old physics and could work over distances of many metres, the researchers said.

Although the team had not built and tested a system, computer models and mathematics suggest it would work.

"There are so many autonomous devices such as cell phones and laptops that have emerged in the last few years," said Assistant Professor Marin Soljacic from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and one of the researchers behind the work.

"We started thinking, 'it would be really convenient if you didn't have to recharge these things'.

"And because we're physicists we asked, 'what kind of physical phenomenon can we use to do this wireless energy transfer?'."

Energy trap

The answer the team came up with was "resonance", a phenomenon that causes an object to vibrate when energy of a certain frequency is applied.

"When you have two resonant objects of the same frequency they tend to couple very strongly," Professor Soljacic told the BBC News website.

Resonance can be seen in musical instruments for example.

"When you play a tune on one, then another instrument with the same acoustic resonance will pick up that tune, it will visibly vibrate," he said.

Instead of using acoustic vibrations, the team's system exploits the resonance of electromagnetic waves. Electromagnetic radiation includes radio waves, infrared and x-rays.

Typically, systems that use electromagnetic radiation, such as radio antennas, are not suitable for the efficient transfer of energy because they scatter energy in all directions, wasting large amounts of it into free space.

To overcome this problem, the team investigated a special class of "non-radiative" objects with so-called "long-lived resonances".

When energy is applied to these objects it remains bound to them, rather than escaping to space. "Tails" of energy, which can be many metres long, flicker over the surface.

"If you bring another resonant object with the same frequency close enough to these tails then it turns out that the energy can tunnel from one object to another," said Professor Soljacic.

Hence, a simple copper antenna designed to have long-lived resonance could transfer energy to a laptop with its own antenna resonating at the same frequency. The computer would be truly wireless.

Any energy not diverted into a gadget or appliance is simply reabsorbed.

The systems that the team have described would be able to transfer energy over three to five metres.

"This would work in a room let's say but you could adapt it to work in a factory," he said.

"You could also scale it down to the microscopic or nanoscopic world."

Old technology

The team from MIT is not the first group to suggest wireless energy transfer.

Nineteenth-century physicist and engineer Nikola Tesla experimented with long-range wireless energy transfer, but his most ambitious attempt - the 29m high aerial known as Wardenclyffe Tower, in New York - failed when he ran out of money.

Others have worked on highly directional mechanisms of energy transfer such as lasers.

However, these require an uninterrupted line of sight, and are therefore not good for powering objects around the home.

A UK company called Splashpower has also designed wireless recharging pads onto which gadget lovers can directly place their phones and MP3 players to recharge them.

The pads use electromagnetic induction to charge devices, the same process used to charge electric toothbrushes.

One of the co-founders of Splashpower, James Hay, said the MIT work was "clearly at an early stage" but "interesting for the future"

"Consumers desire a simple universal solution that frees them from the hassles of plug-in chargers and adaptors," he said.

"Wireless power technology has the potential to deliver on all of these needs."

However, Mr Hay said that transferring the power was only part of the solution.

"There are a number of other aspects that need to be addressed to ensure efficient conversion of power to a form useful to input to devices."

Professor Soljacic will present the work at the American Institute of Physics Industrial Physics Forum in San Francisco on 14 November.

The work was done in collaboration with his colleagues Aristeidis Karalis and John Joannopoulos.
 
Posted on 11-14-06 10:07 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

This is very exciting news.

Now, I have to research about "long-lived resonances" vs traditional "RF" propagation.
 
Posted on 11-14-06 10:22 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Tesla, I am sorry, but I forgot to reply your e-mail. The thing is that the link is broken and the documents couldn't be retrieved from the link you provided.

Sorry again, I should've let you know earlier. And, I'm not from UT Austin myself. I asked my friend to look for that on my behalf. I hope you worked it out, anyway!
 
Posted on 11-15-06 4:06 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I think its just bit exaggerated, I was also working in the field of wireless power
transfer and the concept of sending power wirelessly is pretty old. RADARs do
it all the time. The main issue with wirless power transfer is the efficiency.
Although the author mentions that usage of RADAR is very inefficient he doesnt
mention how efficient is the usage of antenna. We can imagine the scenario ourselves.
If resonance is to be used then the resonant frequency of both antennas should match and
the the emmitting antenna should emit radiation in all directions in order to find the
target antenna. So this is already pretty inefficient. Radars can actually steer the beam
in any desired direction so the main loss is due to diffraction side lobes but in this case,
the whole design is based on initial loss of power.
Anyway I could be wrong but thats what my knowledge so far says.
 
Posted on 11-15-06 9:07 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Slackdemic,

Thanks for your efforts. I finally got my ECG circuit working after downloading similar VI from http://forums.ni.com.

I am glad to discover that we share the similar interest in the field of EE or Applied Physics.

good day.
 
Posted on 11-15-06 10:37 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

everything wireless = exposure to radiation = cancer.
 
Posted on 11-15-06 10:53 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

interesting.
if the 'long-lived resonance' works as it has been explained then sure it sounds like a best bet for wireless power transmission.

"If resonance is to be used then the resonant frequency of both antennas should match and the the emmitting antenna should emit radiation in all directions in order to find the
target antenna."

Divdude,
not necessarily! for "non-radiative' objects, when energy is applied, it tails its energy to another object at resonant freq., and so it does not have to emit the energy in all directions. any unsed energy is reabsorbed. so i guess, it should be pretty efficient than RADAR or LIDAR in which you will need to have a seamless LOS (line of sight). Also RADAR has pretty small beam (in the range of few mm), which are way difficult to be tapped.

LooTe
 
Posted on 11-15-06 12:56 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

wow! now i can foresee cleaner houses in the future. :)
 
Posted on 11-15-06 3:30 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Lootekukur,
Interesting thing there. I would really like to know how the energy gets reabsorbed(Applications in microwave ovens!!!). And Radar systems(Beam steering system) can be created with beam width of several Kms no problem there. Remember the radio waves and microwaves already have quite large wavelength.They are trying to build a system like that in hawai. Well if it indeed is a miracle then great news forspace explorations. Nasa has been trying for years to power robots from the satellite. Especially in moon missions on the darker side.
 
Posted on 11-16-06 10:04 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

well divdude,
while i am not much into "long lived resonance", as per my understanding on the subject, a simple antenna made up of copper can be made non-radiative - meaning, energy will be "bound" to it rather than it getting scattered as with the case of a radiative object. it would be interesting to know the physics of such objects. obviously, energy loss can be greatly optimized, if it works the way it has been explained.

Here's how it works:

1) Power from mains to antenna, which is made of copper

2) Antenna resonates at a frequency of 6.4Mhz, emitting electromagnetic waves

3) 'Tails' of energy from antenna 'tunnel' up to 5m (16.4ft)

4) Electricity picked up by laptop's antenna, which must also be resonating at 6.4Mhz. Energy used to re-charge device

5) Energy not transferred to laptop re-absorbed by source antenna. People/other objects not affected as not resonating at 6.4Mhz


As for satellite, infrared (IR) and microwave transmissions are concerned, they require line of sight (an unobstructed view from transmitter to receiver) between nodes, so the prospect of laser and satellite to provide a seamless power is greatly hindered.

you mentioned that you worked with radar. i am sure it does not require LOS, so it could be a better option than laser/lidar. care to share your experiences? i mean what could be the potential sources of loss apart from the diffraction lobes.

LooTe
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 30 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
ढ्याउ गर्दा दसैँको खसी गनाउच
To Sajha admin
I hope all the fake Nepali refugee get deported
and it begins - on Day 1 Trump will begin operations to deport millions of undocumented immigrants
Travel Document for TPS (approved)
All the Qatar ailines from Nepal canceled to USA
MAGA मार्का कुरा पढेर दिमाग नखपाउनुस !
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters