The king utters no single word of condolence and sympathy towards the family of the deceased in Nagarkot.Isn't it a weird? He sent condolence messages to India when there was a train accident or an explosion in Delhi, to Pakistan when there was an earthquake disaster, but he is mute about the killing of his own country-men (pyara deshbasiharu) by his stupid drunken army man. As a supremo of the army staff, and the head of the state /government, doesn't he have to give a public message? Doesn't he have to console and comfort the grief-striken families?Will he be inferior by doing so?

The Man: Regression
He says: My head bows
The Poll: Minbhivan Incident, 17 Mangshir 2062

Next frame:
How many times do I have to bow my head?
Nagarkot Massacre, 30 Mangshir 2062

Cartoon by Batshyan via Kantipur

I knew it, Becasue Gyane never send any condolence message when people die in nepal. He never had a sympathy word for the Chitawan bus blast either.

It is not his concern either. One of the Praja killed another praja. One of his servant killed another servant in a scuffle. How come it be his responsibility? You can show symapathy toward the victim when victim and the killer are equal to his eyes.

it probably reminded him of the death of his brother... when his nephew, apparently drunk, went on a shooting massacre..

the same thing happened here as well. some drunk f*** getting hold of ammunition and running riot... Kinda have some similarities dun they?

Gyane's probably too distraught by this incident to send condoelnces to the family of the deceased, due to it's striking similarity to the Royal massacre....

politics my dear politics ;oP hehe...duh!

seriously speakin...would a condolence from the king actually mean anything?well for me..might not..for others...only they know..and sympathy??!!!arghhh!!dun mind me..i just got smthing against that word!!! sympathy my foot!EMPATHY PPL!!!!watever that is :oS hehe

Atleast some sympathy is expected, there was no words during Madi carnage, nor here, nor during the Iraq inflamed riots (atleast I did not happen to read them).
Incidences like Nagarkot do happen on daily basis in Nepal, but the casualty was higher and got media coverage, thanks to opportunity awaiting mob herders.
If, the guardian of the nation do not feel the pain and suffering, who will. May be politically it is not possible or his illadvisers are restraining him, but when it comes to lunnecessary loss of precious life it should bled him. This is even more responsible case, coz the one who brought this was his direct subordinate and those who suffered are under his protection ALFN.

Anonymous, of course the words of condolence of sympathy will not bring the dead back but isn't the king ( who consider himself the guradian of the nepali people) should speak something? Why is he so facelss and mute?
Your quote"..and sympathy??!!!arghhh!!dun mind me..i just got smthing against that word!!! sympathy my foot!EMPATHY PPL!!!!watever that is :oS hehe "
Do you mean the families of the dead do not deserve the sympathy of the king? Why don't u speak upfront?

People why do you even expect something like that from a person like him ? Did you really think he would utter few words of condolence? Common. Manche bhayepo....

Questions to you all:
Even if he expresses Condolences and sypathy towards the families of the deceased, is it truly from his heart? If not, then why bother. He did not have sympathy towards his brother and his family, how would he have sympathy towards the "general public" who probably mean less to him than his pet dog at his palace.