झट्ट हेर्दा बिस्वास् गर्नै नसकिने मान्छे । गफाडि चै पक्कै हो । सोच्छु यसले उपन्यास लेख्नुको साटो गान्धर्व गीत गाउने हो भने अझ कति आदर पाउथे होलान ।

माइसन्सार् ले यसलाइ पटक पटक स्थान दिदा ब्लग लेखेर पत्रकारको दावी गर्नेको मनशाय उद्देश्य अनि परिपक्वताको रहस्य पनि रहस्य हुदैन ।अनि त्याहाका पाठकवर्ग यसलाइ अ म्रित् सरह नै पिउछन्, रमाउछन्, वाह वाह गुन्जयमान भैरहन्छ । देशको शिक्ष्या क्षेत्रको राजनितिकरण, प्राज्ञहरुको दलगत गुठबन्दिकरण अनि पार्टिको सदस्यता नै कर्मचारिको मापदन्ड हुने ठाउंमा अब यसलाइ नै किन इतिहास शिरोमणिको उपाधि किन नदिने ? चार पेजको को खोजतलास पन्नाहरु देखायेर बाबुरामलाइ नै च्यालेन्ज दिनु कम कुरो त हैन नि ?

I am agree with you.

What a funny fella

I think he is doing a wonderful job which may help re-write our country's history. Good luck with that brother. And about mentioning him as "Gafadi", i think he is just excited to tell his findings so far. As compared to americans, he is not a Gafadi at all. And trust me i have met a lot of americans to whom i literally have to say "please don't talke too much, its a wate of energy for you".

He will beat everybody, including Maoshits...

Lets see how arko Itihaas will be

But everybody knows Itihaas Jitneharuko Huncha

thats y many truth r hidden in the history

जस्ले जे लेखे पनि हुन्छ। मौका एही हो। फेरी हामी नेपालि हरु पनि जस्ले जे लेखे पनि पत्यायी हाल्छउ/

My point is: nobody dares to criticize Abiral because of the senstivenes s of the issue, even when you know most of it is pure BS. In the changed context if anyone, any true/real historian tries to contradict him then this whole mysansar+kantipur+civil society gang will label him a royalist, reactionary and all that. This is one of the reasons that many people who know or who can prove that Abiral is wrong stay quiet. Since the culture of healthy debate and constructive criticism are yet to develop in Nepali society, and people tend to associate everything with politics, people like abiral+ crackpot historians can get away with whatever crackpot stuff they write. Its simple.

Of course people elsewhere too come up with these sort of crackpot theories at times, but those theories do not get national recogniztion and their "findings" do not get an inch of space in national dailies. The National Enquirer takes care of all those fascinating stuff. In Nepal, The Kathmandu Post which is our LA Times and NY Times and all the times/dailies/chronicals between LA and NY, without veryfying the stuff, publishes the excerpts of Abiral's book. In other words IT (TKP) endorsed it and everybody said wah! wah! kya baat hai and abiral became a historian overnight. Just as narayan Wagle became a Mahan Writer with his cafe book. No one dares to challenge, no one dares to criticize.. this is the biggest problem with our democracy.

Nepal does not have a tabloid press except Kamana, so maybe mysansar can fill that void. But again, do we need another tabloid given that TKP and others, at times, have been endorsing and promoting crackpot, out-of-this world whacko stuff?

Itihas kotalnu ramro kamho tara hamra ye manubaab kali negetive tira matra hernu hunchha kina. Ho kati ramra tiye hola kati naramra,tara kunai pachhaya liyera kunai kam garichha bane tesle purna satya kura pattha lagauna sakina. harek kura tuprai andaz le herna sakin chha, afno najar ma bhar parne kura ho. Tesaile sadhai neutral bayera gareko kamnai satya hunchha jasto malai lagchha.



ma_ko_hoo
www.nepaliko.com

ma ko ho ji,

There are no neutral historians in the world. You can have certian biases, but the key is not to let those biases overshadow your work.