[VIEWED 30397
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
lootekukur
Please log in to subscribe to lootekukur's postings.
Posted on 06-03-08 10:27
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
She will, reports AP, when the Tuesday's dust settles tonight with the final round of primaries in MT and SD. ReadA report from 'USA Today'
Last edited: 03-Jun-08 10:43 AM
|
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
Please log in to subscribe to Captain Haddock's postings.
Posted on 06-06-08 12:46
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
" You also believed Hillary was Hitler-on-making, dont u?"
No. Why, did you?
"About the question thingy, if asking for reason
for decision which Obama's supporter has used it more than a gazillion
times to prove his candidacy is a rhetoric in any sense then what is
not?"
You lost me again. Another rhetorical question - this one perfectly fitting the dictionary definition.
If your objective is to have a conversation, I think it would help if you stated what you stood for and argued why. You haven't done that and for most part have gone off on a tangential hypothesis of how does Loote know what Obama knew. Trust me, if you coherently presented what you stood for, even if people disagreed with you, they would respect the points you were making. I certainly would. I am have been scratching by head and scratching beneath your words to understand what exactly your point is in the larger context of this thread.
That's all really.
|
|
|
Guest4
Please log in to subscribe to Guest4's postings.
Posted on 06-06-08 3:00
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I think Hillary was Hitler-on-making.
She was willing to nuke Iran out just so that she could get some jewish votes. I don't think she would actually nuke Iran in her first term, but she probably would consider it if that meant she would get re-elected for the second term! She is a shamless panderer!
|
|