Hi Everyone,
Politics has never been my subject of interest. However these days I am pretty much regular to read news and listen to BBC. I sometime discuss politics with my friends too.

Since the country is passing through a political phase transition, I couldn't save myself from this political tsunami. So I made an attempt today to record a small part of my political feelings that bothers me a lot. There are many questions in my immature mind I have decided to put them as time permits.

At this moment I am passing through a phase of mind which is suggesting me to record more feelings. However, I am not sure how long will it take to over the phase.

Whenever I write about Dharma and Science, I have always encouraged you to read even though my postings are tiresomely long, but I won't encourage you this time because you will gain almost nothing from these postings. Moreover, I don't have profound knowledge of the subject matter because of lack of interest and lack of study.

Thank you!

Back off leaders ....... last posting.

To the leaders

I am not against of any leaders and their leadership personally. However I don't like the system you have established. In your system, a person can make mistakes, apologizes, get excused and remain in leadership as long as he is alive. In my belief, error in leadership is an overcritical error and there should be no more chance. There should be a flow in the leadership.

You know nature teaches us a lot of things. Since we are one of the natural elements we must follow her laws. Dynamic is one of the fundamental laws of nature. Nothing in this universe is static. To be static is to challenge the law of nature. If you don't exercise you develop disease. Air is fresh when it is flowing; if it is not flowing it is called pollution. Water is pure when it is running; if you collect it and store, it will no longer be fresh. There is a saying also, "the rolling stone collect no yeast"; which sounds very true to me.

Make a flow in the leadership; otherwise you will be challenging the nature. All the laws of nature are final products; we can't change them and modify them. Scientists, Yogis, and philosophers, can not regulate the laws of nature. All they can do is to discover these laws, and have humanity to follow them.

That's why I urge you to flow the this law of nature. Make your system dynamic. Give only one chance to a leader, and let him stay until he is effective and productive. Once his efficiency and productivity decreases set him back, and let the new one to lead. This will maintain the flow in leadership, observing the law of dynamic.

Right now there is no flow in your system. You are polluted, that's why no one wants to accompany you. Make a flow, you will get freshness and that will attract people towards you. What I am demanding is the heart of the established leaders. Most of them are very narrow-minded, sticky, greedy and stingy. They will die but won't abandon the leadership voluntarily. There should be strong voice from outside inside to make these leaders to back off, to make the leadership dynamical.

Leader is not only a person; he/she represents a society. Leader is accountable to all of us. So we shouldn't let anybody lead us; its our duty to find the right one. We can't raise voice demanding for a nice leader because we don't know who is nice. However, we have to raise voice to make a flow in the leadership so that we end of getting right leaders. This is our responsibility.

Whatever may be the political scenario right now, eventually all wrongs will fade out. We will end up getting people's direct rule, the most scientific one, where people will be able to choose their own leaders. Political parties, Maoist and Royalist all has to contribute for the system. Since my focus in this tread is on political parties, I won't talk more about royalists and Maoists.

Contd...

I don't believe that there can be conflict if one is absolutely right and another one is absolutely wrong. For conflict both parties should have comparative amounts of goodies and baddies. Our problem is we stick with one point which is mostly motivated by our personal interest and belief, and hold it tight. No one wants to listen to other. No one wants to communicate with other. There is a saying "communication is half done". It is indeed! We should try to apply it. King, Maoist, leaders all should communicate with each other instead of holding their views and reacting on other's action.

When I make an objective judgment as per my capacity, I find all three parties are logical from their prospective. Logic is not enough. In practice, things differ from the logic. Sometime truth surpasses the logic. Logically ice (solid) should sink in the water (liquid); however, it doesn't happen in reality. Not all the truths can be comprehended through logics. For example, universe is expanding is logical and is truth too; however, it is accelerating is not logical but is the truth. Something which looks right and true may not be right and true. As for instant, sun looks like revolving round the earth but the truth is just opposite.

All I mean is whatever looks like true, many not be true. Something, which sounds logical and rational, may not be logical and rational. So, leaders, Moaists and royalists shouldn't hold their views tightly. They should observe the situation from all possible angles and conclude the truth. Afterall all three parties are claiming that they are fighting for the welfare of the people and the country.

There can not be three different ways to reach to the same conclusion. Something is missing on each side. All three parties are not complete, they have to communicate, and reach to the conclusion. Enough has been the blood shade! It's all because of the stubborness, and stupidity of these three groups.

Solution: Conclusion

King, Maoists and political parties all has to contribute for the country. King has to abandon the power and live a well respected life. He should hand over total power (including army) to the people. Under this condition Maoists should join main stream politics. Multiparty democratic system should be installed in the country. There should be constant flow of leaders in the parties. Through this way, everybody will gain, nobody will lose. I am very much positive that this will be the solution eventually.

This is the greatest opportunity for the king to make positive history in the country and become a father figure. I am pointing towards king because the goal is in his court. It is him who has something extra to give. It is his side where the system is displaced form the equalibrium state.

Parties, king and the Maoists, all should come to the ground state, the most stable state, which is impowering the people and honoring the king. I would like to say this as an equilibrium state. Untill and unless we reach to the equilibrium state there will always be tension in the system and instability will be sustained. This is another law of nature.

Any of the three parties, if tried to pull the power towards it, will find a resistive force towards the equilibrium position, which will be harmful to the party.


Here is my urge:

Please follow the law of dynamics and law of equalibrium!

Too much India reliance may harm our national interest; if only we could handle our own problems without involving others.

Awarding India UNSC seat? Think twice
The style in which New Delhi, the seat of power of the former British and the Moghuls who ruled India for centuries, this time responded to Nepali leaders gave the thought that the Indian leadership were granting audience to its own subjects and that those looking for audience desperately were their low rung people with no standing in the society who could be dictated on any theme beginning politics to whom should rule the independent and sovereign country-Nepal and how Nepal should be governed. Undenyingly, dictates and instructions could only be provided to those who require it at the very first place and also to those who could be considered and taken for granted as the Nepali versions of the MirJaffors and Jaychands of the name and fame of Indian history.

As if that were not enough, this time Indian leadership showed slight evidence of its uncovered diplomacy towards Nepal, a country that may be underprivileged and a divided lot (which it is by all means) but never have had to feel the brunt of colonial subjugation for centuries of the sort of what our poor Indian friends have had to endure. We feel sorry for that. Perhaps it is this colonial agony and mental torture of the past that Indian friends seated in New Delhi wish to practice the same on the smaller states in its neighborhood the result of which is that all the countries in the region whose boundaries come about to touch with India feel threatened of the increasing Indian adventurism that is neither in conformity with the existing diplomatic behavior of states nor could be justified on any moral or diplomatic grounds. At best India's growing dreams to keep her neighbors in an all time alarm could be described as India's "inferiority complex" the medicine of which only Pakistan possesses. The message to the Indian leadership should be clear perhaps.

A country that is ridden with such a complex and a country that nurtures an ambition to rule the entire world through its interventionist policy is aspiring for a seat at the Security Council. The countries that mean and possess a say in the world affairs must think twice on India's elevation to the grade that she is not fit for. By chance if the Indian state occupies a seat at the UN Security Council, the day of her distance from the ground to that prestigious seat would be a black day for the countries of the South Asia. The fact is that the wearer knows where the shoe pinches. Ask B'desh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and more subtly Bhutan what India meant to them? Thanks King Jigme is bearing the brunt but prefers silence. It is this King's style, let's presume. The invariable answer would be that friends could be changed not the neighbors. And alas! Such a neighbor whose territorial appetite and political intervention perhaps has no parallel in the history of the evolution of nations in the modern world has to be dealt with by this tiny Kingdom every now and then.

It is not for nothing that one of the living legend of Nepali politics, Krishna Prasad Bhattarai, the other day candidly told a media gathering that Nepali leaders' visiting New Delhi recently had no sense and that those who were there were either in the payrolls of the South Block or were simply working in favor of that country under disguise. Million dollar revelation indeed.

No where beggars in the word cross their own territories for begging save Nepal. Nepali political beggars are seen more often than not loitering around their masters in New Delhi and abroad seeking for their support to get considerable size of political alms in Nepal.

In conclusion, India this time exhibited its true picture and color while meeting Nepali leaders. The neighboring country , a great country indeed if she maintained that position handed over by their own forefathers, showed that she counted much in Nepali politics. This is her inner ambition indeed. In doing so India signaled Nepal and its monarch that Nepal could be twisted any time if the former so wished. India, however, could not hide this time around that she have had "excellent" relations with the Nepali Maoists whom she had dubbed terrorists much ahead of Nepal declaring the same. The tussle in between the two top hats of Nepali insurgency did expose India's intimate and inseparable linkages with a section of the insurgency. It is perhaps keeping in mind of this "unexposed" fact that the Americans and the British told India to take the Nepali matter seriously and play a role positively. The satire that was hidden in the US and the UK's handing over this onerous task to India was meant to expose India to the hilt in the comity of the nations. However, India did not understand the hidden message of its two bigger and respected partners. Instead it took this as a prize, which it was not. It was only a ploy to embarrass India and the latter felt elevated. Now that the UK and the British friends must have got the point as to which country on earth was supporting Nepali insurgency. It is not for nothing that Nepali King is reported to have hinted a select group of Nepali journalists that the "world now knew as to which country had been supporting the Maoists". This means that Nepali monarch knows now the details of India machinations in Nepal and in its affairs.

One simple advice to India: Behave in a friendly manner. Respect neighboring nations. Honor the sentiments of the Nepalese. Try to preserve the Nepali love and respect for what we have unfailingly for India as a neighboring nation. Your words and deeds must not differ. Don't commit Himalayan blunders of the sort you did this time by embracing the Nepali leaders as if they were your national heroes. Think that the Nepali leaders who could not honor their own motherland can in no way be for your utility. Indeed they will serve you until you fill their pockets with scholarships and other material interests.


Source: From the Weekly Telegraph

Now it's become same old grandma's story.......same stuff anyway though expressions are long. Guys, would you please make your views a bit short, so we can read though we miss those for a day or two. The thread was intresting but I am lost now.......