[VIEWED 7194
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
ratoragat
Please log in to subscribe to ratoragat's postings.
Posted on 07-27-10 2:13
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Obama grants asylum to 86,000 Nepalese to come to USA
http://www.thefirearmsforum.com/showthread.php?t=71602
http://atimes.com/atimes/China/KL15Ad03.html
plz hurry up...who wants to apply for asylum...no matter you are illegal or not.
|
|
|
|
dimag kharab
Please log in to subscribe to dimag kharab's postings.
Posted on 07-27-10 2:24
PM [Snapshot: 37]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
2
?
Liked by
|
|
another dumba$$.
That only for Bhutanese refugees residing in Nepal. You moron.
FYI- Almost 25,000 Bhutanese refugees have already entered US since 2007.
|
|
|
ratoragat
Please log in to subscribe to ratoragat's postings.
Posted on 07-28-10 1:05
AM [Snapshot: 931]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
mucho_fiesta
Please log in to subscribe to mucho_fiesta's postings.
Posted on 07-28-10 6:46
AM [Snapshot: 1091]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
ratoragat
Please log in to subscribe to ratoragat's postings.
Posted on 07-29-10 11:48
AM [Snapshot: 1743]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
So then why they say 86000 Nepalese, They should say Bhutanese refugees hoina ra?
|
|
|
dimag kharab
Please log in to subscribe to dimag kharab's postings.
Posted on 07-29-10 12:41
PM [Snapshot: 1814]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Where have they mentioned "86000 Nepalese", btw? If you are talking about the thread's title in one of your posts, than why did you even bother to post the second article from Asia Times as it clearly mentions "refugee" population.
|
|
|
b27b
Please log in to subscribe to b27b's postings.
Posted on 07-29-10 1:07
PM [Snapshot: 1858]
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
* congratulation u have one apple iPod * lolz
|
|