Go man
kick all those terroriststs, dhotis, dahi chiures and corrupt leaders of Nepal

You can do it, you have the guts
i salute you

As all we know in this situation katwal is HERO

He is the one who always care about Nepal!!!!!!!!!!!!

ha ha
the hero doesnot need to speak anything. He is in his daily routine as always

and look at the dirty politicans.

since one week i dont think they are sleeping well, eating well. they even have to cancel china trip.
It would be better if these terrorists accept the defeat.

they started this without any cause, they are finding false acqusisitions, trying to create "sainik KOO" blaming president, blaming India, blaming each other.
they dont even know whats happening in the terai

they are creating nightmares for themselves

because they know THEY ARE WRONG

Nepal Army has volunteered in several rescue mission during flood, earthquake, and have also participated in constructive works such as road construction. What has PLA done ? Have they done any constructive or positive work?

Nepa Army is the only institution that can save Nepal at the moment. Maoists also know this, thats why they want to eliminate Katawal.

LOL

I agree with UML's proposal. Sack all these three Badal, Katwaal and mainly Kule Kadka, and give COAS to the third in command

Chhatra Gurung.

This is good and consus proposal everybody have to accept

this if you are really worry about Nepal.

 

.

 Nepali Janta Haru Chinta Nagarnu Yo Parchandee Ra Maobadi Lai Ma Thik Gari Hlachu , May Hu Naa

I am worried about this folks!.......Katuwal aaudai ma sab think hune chahhi ma dekhdina....." Nepal ma grihey yuddha bahek aba ma kehi dekhdina"

" Different view, different people"

Civil war ta france ra Usa ma ni bhayeko thiyo...., 80,000 bhanda badhi ta amrica ma nai mareko thiyo .tara dubai ma ahilay ekta cha".................................

WHY NOT IN THIS SMALL COUNTRY??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

You know the most interesting thing in this whole drama was the UML part, they came up with a better proposal where you  take out Katwal but you got to get rid of khadka and badal as well. I found this proposal very sweet and right on the maoist face. It was like lets do it, we are on your side but just there is a little twist. Maoist never felt this coming. I see now prachanda is trying to talk to girja instead because he never felt this coming on them. I hope girja keep his head up and dont try to be greedy with some big offer in the goverment. If he try to go towards maoist side then he cannot be any worst. The worst corrupted leader in the history of nepal.

team logo for your information let me tell you there is unity between both u know why because There was Marin Luther King ....Abhram Lincoln ...but in Nepal there are only Malcolm X ....so there is no source of National Unity ....look gradually one day we all will say gautam Buddha was never born in Nepal

विज्ञप्तिको पूर्ण पाठसैनिक जनसम्पर्क निर्देशनालयको बिज्ञप्ति

बिज्ञप्ति नं। - ७०

मिति - २०६६ बैशाख १६ गते ।

समयः- साँझ ०६२५ बजे ।

नेपाली सेनाको प्रतिबद्धता

१. हाल नेपाली सेनाको सम्वन्धमा विभिन्न संचार माध्यमहरुमा संप्रेसित समाचारहरु
नागरिक समाज लगायत अन्य बुद्धिजिवी वर्गहरुले नेपाली सेनाको सन्र्दभमा सार्वजनिक
गरिरहेका टिकाटिप्पणीहरु प्रति नेपाली सेनाको विशेष ध्यानाकर्षण भएको छ ।

२. सोही विषयमा आम जनसमुदायलाई पुनः आश्वस्त पार्न आज मिति २०६६÷०१÷१६ गते
अपराहन्न जंगी अड्डामा नेपाली सेनाका प्रधानसेनापति महारथी श्री रुकंमाङ्गद कटवाल
बलाध्यक्ष रथी श्री कुल बहादुर खड्का बलाधिकृत रथी श्री छत्रमान िसंह गुरुङ्ग तथा
अन्य उच्च पदस्थ पदाधिकारीहरु उपस्थित एक समारोहमा नेपाली सेनाको संगठनात्मक
एक्यबद्धता माथीको प्रतिबद्धता पुनः प्रकट गरिएको छ ।

३. सो बैठकमा नेपाली सेनाको नेतृत्व वर्गले प्रकट गरेको प्रतिबद्धता परिशिष्ट
'क' यसै बिज्ञप्ती साथ संलग्न गरी पठाईएको छ ।

परिशिष्ट 'क'

१. प्रधानसेनापति महारथी श्री रुकमाङ्गद कटवालको प्रतिबद्धता: गौरवमय ईतिहास
बोकेको र जनता प्रति सदैव उत्तरदायी रहेको नेपाली सेनाको नेतृत्व वर्ग लगायत सकल
दर्जा एक ढिक्का भई उच्च अनुशासनमा रही राष्ट्रको सुरक्षा र राष्ट्रियताको जगेर्ना
गर्नका लागि राज्यले दिएका जिम्मेवारीहरुलाई निर्वाह गर्दै आएका छौं । विगत केही
दिन यता विभिन्न संचार माध्यमहरुमा नेपाली सेनाको अनुशासन तथा बरिष्ठ अधिकृतहरु
विशेषतः प्रधान सेनापति लगायत बरिष्ठतम रथीहरुका बिचको सम्बन्धलाई लिएर आएको समाचार
प्रति हाम्रो गम्भीर ध्यानाकर्षण भएकोले त्यस्तो समाचारमा कुनै सत्यता नभएको र त्यो
भ्रामक र कपोलकल्पीत मात्रै भएको स्पष्ट गर्न चाहन्छौं । यस सन्दर्भमा म नेपाली
सेनाको प्रधान सेनापति महारथी श्री रुकमाङ्गद कटवाल बलाध्यक्ष रथी श्री कुल बहादुर
खड्का र बलाधिकृत रथी श्री छत्रमान िसंह गुरुङ्गको बीचमा कुनै मन मुटाव वा द्धैश
नभएको र हामीहरु आ आफ्नो नियुक्तिमा प्रचलित नियम कानुन र आफ्नो चेन अफ कमान्ड
अनुसार नेपाली सेनाको गैरराजनैतिक चरित्रलाई कायम राख्दै यसको संस्थागत विकास गर्न
र राष्ट्रिय सेनाको राष्ट्रिय चरित्रलाई अझ व्यापक र अझ जनता केन्द्रित बनाउन सक्षम
छौं र त्यसैकार्यमा कटिबद्ध पनि छौं । हामीहरु व्यक्तिगत तथा संस्थागत दुवै रुपमा
नेपालको संविधान प्रचलित कानुन र विगतका शान्ति सम्झौताहरु प्रति पूर्ण रुपमा
प्रतिबद्ध र लोकतान्त्रिक पद्धति प्रति समर्पित रही शान्ति प्रकृयालाई तार्किक
निश्कर्षमा लैजानका लागि राज्य र जननिर्वाचित प्रतिनिधिहरुलाई हरेक प्रकारको सहयोग
गर्नका लागि सदैव तत्पर रहेको जानकारी गराउंदछौं।'

२. बलाध्यक्ष रथी श्री कुल बहादुर खड्काको प्रतिबद्धता: 'प्रधान सेनापतिले भन्नु
भएको कुरामा मेरो पुर्ण सहमति समर्थन र प्रतिबद्धता छ।'

३. बलाधिकृत रथी श्री छत्रमानिसंह गुरुङ्गको प्रतिबद्धता: 'प्रधान सेनापति र
बलाध्यक्ष ज्यू ले भन्नु भएको कुरामा मेरो पुर्ण सहमति समर्थन र प्रतिबद्धता
छ।'

Go ahead and shoot all those mf monkeys from jungle. U have the gun n U have the guts.

unlike bhaate prachande, his looks speak dedication and patriotism

YOU ARE DAMN RIGHT, HE IS A REAL HERO OF NEPAL. I SALUTE YOU MR KATWAL FOR YOUR PATRIOTISM FOR YOUR COUNTR AND STANDING AGAINST ALL THE ODDS. YOU CAME OUT TO BE THE BEST PERSON THAN ANY OF THE POLITICIANS WHO HAVE BEEN RUNNING OUR COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY MAOIST. GOD BELL YOU.

Thanks for exposing these Maoist scum. Whatever your failings, you now have my respect and no doubt of a great many Nepalis.

I will support army control in nepal than any political bull shit. At least we dont have to keep fighting about congress, communist, rpp and madehsi forms. At least rukmangat katwal seems to be the best in performing his duties. I am pretty sure he will lead our country in the right direction, especially corrupt free. May be we will  have another problem from maoist again, maybe from indian backed some terai based parties. We cannot even trust congress too. Maoist came because of these parties. They barely thought about the country and people. That is why we dont even have water and electricity in our homes. Melamchi project never got started because of corruption. You can always judge these parties especially from the past. I bet there will be no change if still same parties come over and over with the same people running the country. I think we need change. A bigger change. A change like obama in america. A change that we can count on. I would at least suggest one more term for this Rukmangat katwal in his post and make him run the country.

At this juncture Military coup is the only way out! Send Prachanda to meet Sadam Hussain of Iraq!!

Ram Baran Yadav vs His Detractors

KULCHANDRA GAUTAM During the last 6-7 years I have had the opportunity to meet, observe and get to know many Nepali leaders from different political parties, civil society and other walks of life. I have found many smart, intelligent, articulate and committed leaders, some of whom have made great sacrifice for the nation. I have also found many cunning, calculating, and demagogic leaders, who excel in using their oratorical skills to vilify others and glorify themselves or their party in a self-serving and self-righteous manner. It is in the nature of competitive politics everywhere that sometimes even the most mature, responsible and enlightened leaders take partisan positions, especially in the heat of electoral campaigns. But truly great and decent leaders often rise to the occasion and overcome their partisanship and become champions of broader national interest. Of all the contemporary political leaders of Nepal, I have found Ram Baran Yadav to be one such exemplary leader. I did not know much about Ram Baran Yadav until he became Nepal’s first president. I have personally known him only for a few months. But during this time I have found one admirable quality in him that I have rarely found in any other contemporary leader of Nepal. He has been a consistent champion of what he believes to be in the best interest of Nepal as a nation. President Ram Baran Yadav has been an exemplary leader. He has been a consistent champion of what he believes to be in the best interest of Nepal as a nation. Scratch the surface, and you will find that most other leaders are driven by either their party’s ideological interest or their own self interest in terms of class, caste, ethnicity, region, etc. often cloaked as representing the national interest. But as president, Ram Baran Yadav has impressed me – and many other Nepalis - as one of those rare Nepali leaders who have always stood for the unity, integrity, and prosperity of the nation as a whole, rather than its sub-component parts. It is, therefore, extremely painful to see this decent man being vilified as acting unconstitutionally and undemocratically by partisan politicians and activists whose own record of following constitutional norms and democratic practices is deeply flawed and suspect. The Supreme Court will soon decide if the president’s actions were constitutional. The case could also be taken to the sovereign Constituent Assembly which after all symbolizes the supremacy of the people, and has the power to even impeach the president. But his detractors have no patience or use for such constitutional and democratic remedies. In the name of “civilian supremacy” they are hell-bent to impose their views through street pressure and intimidation – i.e. through any and all means – except the designated constitutional means, as practiced in most civilized democratic states. It is ironic that the one political party that has not renounced violence, that keeps a private army of its own, and that still subscribes to an ideology of “power comes from the barrel of the gun”, claims to stand for “civilian supremacy”. All other political parties with a much longer and consistent record of following democratic norms are castigated as supporting militarization, and being feudal, reactionary, anti-people, lackeys of foreigners – as certified by self-proclaimed defenders of the people. The Maoists and their sympathizers being the only supporters of “civilian supremacy” sounds curiously like the old Nepali saying “the cat is the watchdog of the milk” – doodhko saakshi biraalo! No political party in Nepal currently matches the para-military youth organization and other fraternal groups aligned with the Maoists in terms of their capacity to organize demonstrations, agitation, intimidation and even what is known as “physical action” – i.e. killing and maiming of their opponents. Currently such activism has been unleashed to give the impression that the whole country is united against the president’s “unconstitutional” act. In this effort, the Maoist cause has been greatly aided by a group of supposedly “neutral” civil society leaders – some of whom had played an important role at the time of the 2006 People’s Movement, but who seem to have aligned themselves, perhaps even inadvertently, with the Maoists since then. The one-sided vitriol coming from some members of this civil society leadership is breath-taking. Reminiscent of the hired propagandists in the Stalin-era communist regimes, a well-known and thoroughly partisan leftist writer known for his poison-pen activism characterizes Ram Baran Yadav as “an evil president who is tempted by greed for power, and is desperately seeking a crown and a throne”. No one with an iota of objectivity would characterize Yadav, a humble son of a farmer and a life-long democrat, in such hyperbolic terms. It is understandable for the Maoists to charge that the president violated the Constitution. But how about the constitutionality of the decision taken by a coalition government during a cabinet meeting boycotted by over half of its ministers and objected to by all coalition partners of the prime minister’s party? In a parliamentary system, is it not the constitutional duty of the president to take account of the views conveyed to him in writing by 18 political parties representing the majority of the membership of the Constituent Assembly? And how about the constitutionality of the unilateral actions of a prime minister who no longer commanded the support of his coalition partners on this issue and whose government had effectively ceased to enjoy the support of a majority of CA members? There is something deeply disturbing about supposedly “neutral” civil society leaders not even granting the benefit of doubt to a president with life-long record of commitment to norms of democracy, while granting carte blanche credibility to unilateral decisions of a party which waged a violent insurgency against parliamentary democracy. There is a cruel irony in a political party and its leaders who maintain their own private army and who have publicly and unapologetically vowed to destabilize and politicize a professional national army claiming to stand for “civilian supremacy”. This is not to blindly defend the Nepal Army or its chief as paragons of virtue. There are many documented cases of unprofessional behavior, human rights abuses and impunity perpetrated by the army in the past. But the Maoist army is no less guilty of its own brutalities, forced recruitment, including that of minors, and other violations of human rights and impunity. Furthermore, in terms of “civilian supremacy” a national army infiltrated by the ideologically indoctrinated partisan army of one political party is infinitely less likely to follow such supremacy, unless it is that of its own political party masters. Whereas one can speculate about the president’s intentions, the Maoists’ intentions to infiltrate the army, destabilize other independent institutions and to capture state power need no speculation – the official pronouncement of the recent Maoist party convention in Kharipati, Prachanda’s video-taped message to his party cadres in January 2008, and a consistent pattern of follow-up actions ever since, are there in the public domain for all to see. Yet, it is the humble and decent Ram Baran Yadav, circumscribed by the decorum of his office; and mindful of his constitutional duties, who is being portrayed as the villain. Yadav possibly helped prevent a major national disaster by his difficult but thoughtful decision not to lend constitutional legitimacy to a seemingly unconstitutional and unilateral act of the ruling political party on May 3, 2009. The Supreme Court and history of Nepal will judge whether he was a hero or a villain. But there is no question in my mind that his decency, his love of the nation, his commitment to democracy and genuine “civilian supremacy” is unmatched by his self-serving opponents and detractors. (Writer is former Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations, and Deputy Executive Director of UNICEF.)

we salute you