Can we start the string with latest nepalnews in timely manner. Chainchuin kehi chhaina. Get started.

wasn't it just last week that Gyane le Dalai Lama ko office banda gareko?

WHY ONLY CHINESE MEDIAK KNOW THIS

KATHMANDU, Feb. 2 (Xinhuanet) -- Nepal's King Gyanendra announced the lineup of a new Council of Ministers, or cabinet, Wednesday morning, a day after he sacked the government and imposed a state of emergency.

Members of the new cabinet are listed as follows:

Minister for Foreign Affairs: Ramesh Nath Pandey;

Minister for Education and Sports: Radha Krishna Mainali;

Minister for General Administration: Krishna Lal Thakali;

Minister for Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation: Buddhi Raj Bajracharya;

Minister for Women, Children and Social Welfare: Mrs. Durga Shrestha;

Minister for Information and Communications: Tanka Dhakal;

Minister for Home and Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs: Dan Bahadur Shahi;

Minister for Local Development: Khadga Bahadur GC;

Minister for Labor and Transport Management: Ram Narayan Singh;

Minister for Finance: Madhukar Shumsher JB Rana. Enditem

See what I mean. And china also called it an "internal affair

Sure, that is a good point so this might have been done with the approval of the Chinese. But do you think that's going to help Gyane to get India's cooperation, Maobadi ko neta haru lai samatna? Jhan garo hundaina? Ke sochya hola gyane le?

tyasto kura nagarnuhos.

I think India is just playing along. Wasn't Gyane with the shankaracharya a few months ago?

nepal king can not take away the democracy........................

nepal king can not take away the democracy........................

nepal king can not take away the democracy........................

let's unite for democracy...................

Nepal's King Gyanendra (C) talks to newly appointed ministers after a swearing-in ceremony in Kathmandu February 2, 2005. Nepal's King Gyanendra unveiled a 10-member cabinet under his leadership on Wednesday, a day after he sacked the prime minister for failing to hold elections or end an escalating civil war with Maoist rebels. REUTERS/Stringer

This site updates its news every 5 minutes.

- http://www.newsnow.co.uk/newsfeed/?name=Nepal

South Asian Summit Put Off After India Pulls Out

Pakistan disappointed with SAARC summit postponement

Flights Resume As Nepali Airport Reopens

Thanks for the pic! Looks like Gyane is pretty determined. Come on guys, lets be practical: democracy hasn't helped resolve the Maoist problem so why not try something else? If we just blindly ask for democracy like 1whocandie4u suggests, we are no better than the Maoists and their propoganda...

I agree 100% of what KING GYAN' did. And Im not a anti-Democratic, or Panche.... When I heard the news yesterday... that was the best news ever from Nepal. I understand... these so called DEMOCRACY lover felling f***-off, and news about India, UK, USA... upset about Nepal incident.. Only one thing I have to say to them is-

"GIVE PEACE A CHANCE!" - J. Lennon

and whatever it takes to bring peace in Nepal, is acceptable to me. As king said he will do it within 3yrs, we all should give him a chance... or get ready for

MAOIST's PEOPLE REPUBLIC of NEPAL.

HAIL THE KING!!
F*** ALL THE POLITICAL PARTIES!! MIDDLE FINGER TO THE REST OF THE WORLD WHO OPPOSE THIS!!!

I agree with you.

Maoists likely to profit as democracy goes into suspension

Before he was crowned in the wake of a 2001 royal massacre, King Gyanendra was an enthusiastic conservationist of the Hindu kingdom's mountainous wilds.

Most of those wild Himalayan areas are now under the control of Nepal's increasingly ominous Maoist insurgency. Many believe that Tuesday?s move, in which Gyanendra announced he was suspending democracy in order to save it, will only add grist to the Maoist mill.

The king is likely to seek direct talks with the Maoists, without having to consult what he sees as Kathmandu's incorrigibly venal political class.

Nevertheless, the palace coup is only likely to enhance the credibility of the Maoists, one of whose demands is abolition of the monarchy.

Many among Nepal's mainstream population will see Gyanendra?s move as a transparent attempt to aggrandise power for its own sake.

Scepticism about Gyanendra?s attitude to power dates from the moment his brother, Birendra, was killed by crown-prince Dipendra (who then allegedly turned the gun on himself) in June 2001. Many in Nepal still give credence to the rumours that King Gyanendra himself, or Paras, his deeply unpopular son, who was present at the palace massacre, were in some way involved.

"It doesn't matter whether the conspiracy theory is true or not - and there is not much evidence to support it," says S.D. Muni, an academic of modern Nepal, based in New Delhi. "What matters is how many people believe it - Gyanendra and his son are deeply disliked among large sections of Nepalis."

There is little doubt that the standing of the monarch in Nepal has plummeted since Gyanendra took the throne. Whereas Birendra's portrait was hanging in almost every home, King Gyanendra's likeness is notable in its rarity.

The monarch?s dwindling popularity has not been assisted by the antics of Paras, his only son and official heir, whose reputation for drunken thuggery is undisputed. "The Most Feared Man in Nepal", is the cover story headline on this month's issue of one magazine in New Delhi.

But Nepal's media, which, during the reign of King Birendra, had been reluctant to indulge in any criticism of the monarchy, has published regular accounts of incidents in which Paras has allegedly beaten up people in Kathmandu nightclubs and, in one case, killed a motorcyclist in a drink-driving accident.

As a royal, Paras can only be prosecuted by consent of the king. "Paras is a bad apple, plain and simple," said a Nepalese businessman close to the family. "He has done incalculable damage to the royal family."

But any such fall-out pales in comparison to the monarch?s gamble in suspending democracy for three years.

According to friends, the king is an intelligent man who would have anticipated international condemnation of the move. Furthermore, many sympathise with King Gyanendra's frustration over the corrupt character of Nepal's political parties.

But to justify his action, the king will need to settle with the Maoists and build a "genuine" democracy in Nepal.

Even assuming it were possible to accomplish either of these tall orders, doing so would risk the abolition of what traditional Nepalis believe is his family's divine right to rule.

According to tradition, Nepal's king is seen as an incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu - the preserver. After yesterday, some will jest Gyanendra would be a more fitting avatar of Shiva - the destroyer.
source: www.ft.com (Edward luce)

i think this is a good thing... as long as he doesnt go killing people.

Kudos to my Bro Aryan - I hear you - Hail to your comment - Middle finger to the rest of the World undermining the possibility of unity among our people. To those against us - solve your own shit first - before you come put your hands on ours. HAhahah

BBC reports on Media censhorship in Nepal. What Rising Nepal etc are saying about the takeover.

I saw this link on:

http://www.nepalchildren.org/latest/where they are keeping track of the latest happenings in Nepal.